Review



rabbit anti gata3  (Boster Bio)


Bioz Verified Symbol Boster Bio is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Boster Bio manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Boster Bio rabbit anti gata3
    Rabbit Anti Gata3, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti gata3/product/Boster Bio
    Average 94 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    rabbit anti gata3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Sino Biological anti gata3
    Anti Gata3, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti gata3/product/Sino Biological
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti gata3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Boster Bio rabbit anti gata3
    Rabbit Anti Gata3, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti gata3/product/Boster Bio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti gata3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibody rabbit anti-gata3
    Antibody Rabbit Anti Gata3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody rabbit anti-gata3/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody rabbit anti-gata3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc gata3
    (A) Left, DotPlot of canonical trophoblast marker expression across TO-derived clusters. Right, FeaturePlots of <t>GATA3</t> (top) and KRT7 (bottom) expression in TOs. Scales at right. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence staining for GATA3 (top, green) and KRT7(bottom, green) with actin (red), confirming widespread trophoblast marker expression throughout organoids. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue); right panels show individual grayscale channels. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) UMAP showing final cell type annotations based on trajectory and root cluster analysis, including mononuclear trophoblasts (mTB), invasive trophoblasts (iTB1, iTB2), syncytiotrophoblasts (sTB1, sTB2), proliferative progenitors (TB-p1–3), and transitional populations (tTB1–3). Key at right. (D) Dot plots of canonical trophoblast markers (e.g., TEAD4 , MSX2 , KRT18 , MAL2 , HOPX ), validating cell type assignments. Scale at right. (E) Bar plot showing the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) following poly I:C treatment in human and Jfb TOs, using DESeq2 (log2FC > 1, adjusted p < 0.05). Upregulated genes are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. (F) Volcano plots of DEGs in human (left) and bat (right) TOs after poly I:C exposure. Significantly upregulated interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are labeled in red in human TOs, while Jfb TOs show minimal transcriptional changes. Non-ISG DEGs are shown in light blue and non-significant genes are shown in grey. (G) Lollipop plot showing poly I:C–induced log2 fold changes in selected interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and interferon lambda ( IFNL ) genes in human (red) and Jfb (yellow) TOs. The plot highlights consistently higher induction of antiviral genes in human cells compared to bat cells following stimulation. (H) Heatmap of top poly I:C–responsive genes (ranked by log2FC) showing markedly higher induction in human compared to Jfb TOs. Red indicates high indiction and grey/white indicates no or low induction. Scale at right. (I) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of ISGs and IFN genes expressed in mock and poly I:C-treated TOs, grouped by species. Bat TOs exhibit limited upregulation following stimulation. Scale at right. (J) Boxplot comparing ISG scores in human and Jfb TOs under mock and poly I:C-treated conditions. Jfb TOs show elevated ISG expression at baseline (mock), whereas human TOs exhibit a greater dynamic induction following poly I:C treatment. (K) Boxplots showing expression of representative ISGs ( IRF35 , IFIT3 ) across species and conditions. (L) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of key innate immune signaling genes including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I–like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), adaptor proteins, inflammasome components, and downstream transcription factors across mock-treated Jfb and human TOs. Genes are grouped by functional category, with color-coded annotations at right. Expression values were derived from gene reads. (M) Boxplots comparing baseline and induced expression of select PRRs ( TLR3 , TLR2 , NOD1 ), further supporting attenuated innate immune sensing in bat TOs.
    Gata3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gata3/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gata3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Proteintech rabbit anti mouse gata3 antibody
    (A) Left, DotPlot of canonical trophoblast marker expression across TO-derived clusters. Right, FeaturePlots of <t>GATA3</t> (top) and KRT7 (bottom) expression in TOs. Scales at right. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence staining for GATA3 (top, green) and KRT7(bottom, green) with actin (red), confirming widespread trophoblast marker expression throughout organoids. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue); right panels show individual grayscale channels. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) UMAP showing final cell type annotations based on trajectory and root cluster analysis, including mononuclear trophoblasts (mTB), invasive trophoblasts (iTB1, iTB2), syncytiotrophoblasts (sTB1, sTB2), proliferative progenitors (TB-p1–3), and transitional populations (tTB1–3). Key at right. (D) Dot plots of canonical trophoblast markers (e.g., TEAD4 , MSX2 , KRT18 , MAL2 , HOPX ), validating cell type assignments. Scale at right. (E) Bar plot showing the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) following poly I:C treatment in human and Jfb TOs, using DESeq2 (log2FC > 1, adjusted p < 0.05). Upregulated genes are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. (F) Volcano plots of DEGs in human (left) and bat (right) TOs after poly I:C exposure. Significantly upregulated interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are labeled in red in human TOs, while Jfb TOs show minimal transcriptional changes. Non-ISG DEGs are shown in light blue and non-significant genes are shown in grey. (G) Lollipop plot showing poly I:C–induced log2 fold changes in selected interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and interferon lambda ( IFNL ) genes in human (red) and Jfb (yellow) TOs. The plot highlights consistently higher induction of antiviral genes in human cells compared to bat cells following stimulation. (H) Heatmap of top poly I:C–responsive genes (ranked by log2FC) showing markedly higher induction in human compared to Jfb TOs. Red indicates high indiction and grey/white indicates no or low induction. Scale at right. (I) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of ISGs and IFN genes expressed in mock and poly I:C-treated TOs, grouped by species. Bat TOs exhibit limited upregulation following stimulation. Scale at right. (J) Boxplot comparing ISG scores in human and Jfb TOs under mock and poly I:C-treated conditions. Jfb TOs show elevated ISG expression at baseline (mock), whereas human TOs exhibit a greater dynamic induction following poly I:C treatment. (K) Boxplots showing expression of representative ISGs ( IRF35 , IFIT3 ) across species and conditions. (L) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of key innate immune signaling genes including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I–like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), adaptor proteins, inflammasome components, and downstream transcription factors across mock-treated Jfb and human TOs. Genes are grouped by functional category, with color-coded annotations at right. Expression values were derived from gene reads. (M) Boxplots comparing baseline and induced expression of select PRRs ( TLR3 , TLR2 , NOD1 ), further supporting attenuated innate immune sensing in bat TOs.
    Rabbit Anti Mouse Gata3 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti mouse gata3 antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti mouse gata3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti gata3
    (A) Left, DotPlot of canonical trophoblast marker expression across TO-derived clusters. Right, FeaturePlots of <t>GATA3</t> (top) and KRT7 (bottom) expression in TOs. Scales at right. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence staining for GATA3 (top, green) and KRT7(bottom, green) with actin (red), confirming widespread trophoblast marker expression throughout organoids. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue); right panels show individual grayscale channels. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) UMAP showing final cell type annotations based on trajectory and root cluster analysis, including mononuclear trophoblasts (mTB), invasive trophoblasts (iTB1, iTB2), syncytiotrophoblasts (sTB1, sTB2), proliferative progenitors (TB-p1–3), and transitional populations (tTB1–3). Key at right. (D) Dot plots of canonical trophoblast markers (e.g., TEAD4 , MSX2 , KRT18 , MAL2 , HOPX ), validating cell type assignments. Scale at right. (E) Bar plot showing the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) following poly I:C treatment in human and Jfb TOs, using DESeq2 (log2FC > 1, adjusted p < 0.05). Upregulated genes are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. (F) Volcano plots of DEGs in human (left) and bat (right) TOs after poly I:C exposure. Significantly upregulated interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are labeled in red in human TOs, while Jfb TOs show minimal transcriptional changes. Non-ISG DEGs are shown in light blue and non-significant genes are shown in grey. (G) Lollipop plot showing poly I:C–induced log2 fold changes in selected interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and interferon lambda ( IFNL ) genes in human (red) and Jfb (yellow) TOs. The plot highlights consistently higher induction of antiviral genes in human cells compared to bat cells following stimulation. (H) Heatmap of top poly I:C–responsive genes (ranked by log2FC) showing markedly higher induction in human compared to Jfb TOs. Red indicates high indiction and grey/white indicates no or low induction. Scale at right. (I) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of ISGs and IFN genes expressed in mock and poly I:C-treated TOs, grouped by species. Bat TOs exhibit limited upregulation following stimulation. Scale at right. (J) Boxplot comparing ISG scores in human and Jfb TOs under mock and poly I:C-treated conditions. Jfb TOs show elevated ISG expression at baseline (mock), whereas human TOs exhibit a greater dynamic induction following poly I:C treatment. (K) Boxplots showing expression of representative ISGs ( IRF35 , IFIT3 ) across species and conditions. (L) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of key innate immune signaling genes including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I–like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), adaptor proteins, inflammasome components, and downstream transcription factors across mock-treated Jfb and human TOs. Genes are grouped by functional category, with color-coded annotations at right. Expression values were derived from gene reads. (M) Boxplots comparing baseline and induced expression of select PRRs ( TLR3 , TLR2 , NOD1 ), further supporting attenuated innate immune sensing in bat TOs.
    Anti Gata3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti gata3/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti gata3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit monoclonal anti gata3

    Rabbit Monoclonal Anti Gata3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit monoclonal anti gata3/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit monoclonal anti gata3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Left, DotPlot of canonical trophoblast marker expression across TO-derived clusters. Right, FeaturePlots of GATA3 (top) and KRT7 (bottom) expression in TOs. Scales at right. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence staining for GATA3 (top, green) and KRT7(bottom, green) with actin (red), confirming widespread trophoblast marker expression throughout organoids. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue); right panels show individual grayscale channels. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) UMAP showing final cell type annotations based on trajectory and root cluster analysis, including mononuclear trophoblasts (mTB), invasive trophoblasts (iTB1, iTB2), syncytiotrophoblasts (sTB1, sTB2), proliferative progenitors (TB-p1–3), and transitional populations (tTB1–3). Key at right. (D) Dot plots of canonical trophoblast markers (e.g., TEAD4 , MSX2 , KRT18 , MAL2 , HOPX ), validating cell type assignments. Scale at right. (E) Bar plot showing the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) following poly I:C treatment in human and Jfb TOs, using DESeq2 (log2FC > 1, adjusted p < 0.05). Upregulated genes are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. (F) Volcano plots of DEGs in human (left) and bat (right) TOs after poly I:C exposure. Significantly upregulated interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are labeled in red in human TOs, while Jfb TOs show minimal transcriptional changes. Non-ISG DEGs are shown in light blue and non-significant genes are shown in grey. (G) Lollipop plot showing poly I:C–induced log2 fold changes in selected interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and interferon lambda ( IFNL ) genes in human (red) and Jfb (yellow) TOs. The plot highlights consistently higher induction of antiviral genes in human cells compared to bat cells following stimulation. (H) Heatmap of top poly I:C–responsive genes (ranked by log2FC) showing markedly higher induction in human compared to Jfb TOs. Red indicates high indiction and grey/white indicates no or low induction. Scale at right. (I) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of ISGs and IFN genes expressed in mock and poly I:C-treated TOs, grouped by species. Bat TOs exhibit limited upregulation following stimulation. Scale at right. (J) Boxplot comparing ISG scores in human and Jfb TOs under mock and poly I:C-treated conditions. Jfb TOs show elevated ISG expression at baseline (mock), whereas human TOs exhibit a greater dynamic induction following poly I:C treatment. (K) Boxplots showing expression of representative ISGs ( IRF35 , IFIT3 ) across species and conditions. (L) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of key innate immune signaling genes including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I–like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), adaptor proteins, inflammasome components, and downstream transcription factors across mock-treated Jfb and human TOs. Genes are grouped by functional category, with color-coded annotations at right. Expression values were derived from gene reads. (M) Boxplots comparing baseline and induced expression of select PRRs ( TLR3 , TLR2 , NOD1 ), further supporting attenuated innate immune sensing in bat TOs.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Cellular and Immune Adaptations at the Maternal–Fetal Interface in Bats

    doi: 10.1101/2025.05.15.654282

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Left, DotPlot of canonical trophoblast marker expression across TO-derived clusters. Right, FeaturePlots of GATA3 (top) and KRT7 (bottom) expression in TOs. Scales at right. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence staining for GATA3 (top, green) and KRT7(bottom, green) with actin (red), confirming widespread trophoblast marker expression throughout organoids. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue); right panels show individual grayscale channels. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) UMAP showing final cell type annotations based on trajectory and root cluster analysis, including mononuclear trophoblasts (mTB), invasive trophoblasts (iTB1, iTB2), syncytiotrophoblasts (sTB1, sTB2), proliferative progenitors (TB-p1–3), and transitional populations (tTB1–3). Key at right. (D) Dot plots of canonical trophoblast markers (e.g., TEAD4 , MSX2 , KRT18 , MAL2 , HOPX ), validating cell type assignments. Scale at right. (E) Bar plot showing the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) following poly I:C treatment in human and Jfb TOs, using DESeq2 (log2FC > 1, adjusted p < 0.05). Upregulated genes are shown in red and downregulated are shown in blue. (F) Volcano plots of DEGs in human (left) and bat (right) TOs after poly I:C exposure. Significantly upregulated interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are labeled in red in human TOs, while Jfb TOs show minimal transcriptional changes. Non-ISG DEGs are shown in light blue and non-significant genes are shown in grey. (G) Lollipop plot showing poly I:C–induced log2 fold changes in selected interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and interferon lambda ( IFNL ) genes in human (red) and Jfb (yellow) TOs. The plot highlights consistently higher induction of antiviral genes in human cells compared to bat cells following stimulation. (H) Heatmap of top poly I:C–responsive genes (ranked by log2FC) showing markedly higher induction in human compared to Jfb TOs. Red indicates high indiction and grey/white indicates no or low induction. Scale at right. (I) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of ISGs and IFN genes expressed in mock and poly I:C-treated TOs, grouped by species. Bat TOs exhibit limited upregulation following stimulation. Scale at right. (J) Boxplot comparing ISG scores in human and Jfb TOs under mock and poly I:C-treated conditions. Jfb TOs show elevated ISG expression at baseline (mock), whereas human TOs exhibit a greater dynamic induction following poly I:C treatment. (K) Boxplots showing expression of representative ISGs ( IRF35 , IFIT3 ) across species and conditions. (L) Heatmap showing scaled average expression (Z-score) of key innate immune signaling genes including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I–like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), adaptor proteins, inflammasome components, and downstream transcription factors across mock-treated Jfb and human TOs. Genes are grouped by functional category, with color-coded annotations at right. Expression values were derived from gene reads. (M) Boxplots comparing baseline and induced expression of select PRRs ( TLR3 , TLR2 , NOD1 ), further supporting attenuated innate immune sensing in bat TOs.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: KRT18 (1:100; Abcam, ab668), pan-KRT (1:100; Abcam, ab308262), KRT7 (1:200; Abcam, ab181598), GATA3 (CST, 5852), E-cadherin (CDH1, Invitrogen, PA5-85088).

    Techniques: Marker, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Labeling, Functional Assay

    Journal: Cell Genomics

    Article Title: Interpreting regulatory mechanisms of Hippo signaling through a deep learning sequence model

    doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100821

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Rabbit monoclonal anti-GATA3 , Cell Signaling , 5852T.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Recombinant, Ligation, Gel Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Hybridization, Cloning, Luciferase, CRISPR, Plasmid Preparation, Software, Sonication, Microscopy